Shakespeare’s The Tempest tells the story of an
orchestrated plot to safely shipwreck a sailing crew of nobles. The man behind the storm, Prospero, initially
desires to confront the man who overthrew him as duke, Antonio; however, new
wrinkles are added to his plan as the story progresses.
In Act I, Scene ii, Prospero’s daughter,
Miranda, sees King Alonso’s son, Ferdinand and falls in love. Prospero understands this and makes the first
minor change to his plan: he will acquire Ferdinand and allow the marriage of
his daughter to him.
Prospero makes small addition to his plan again when he is told of what Ariel discovered from
Caliban, Trinculo, and Stephano in Act III, scene ii. The trio plot to steal Prospero’s magical
books and kill him; Stephano then plans to become king of the island, taking
Miranda as his queen. Prospero easily
foils these plans in Act IV, scene I when he summons spirits to scare the
drunken men away.
I believe Prospero’s
final confrontation with Antonio and the other nobles seems unchanged from his
initial plan. His words about the men,
prior to this scene, never seem vindictive, and his forgiveness and final
speech towards the men seems well thought out and planned. All along Prospero wished to confront the man
that usurped his title and forgive him without stooping down to his level and
exacting revenge. He only altered his
plan when he felt it would be responsible and positive, taking all parties into
account. By not exacting his revenge,
Prospero in effect makes the guilty men feel regret and shame for their
actions.
You mention how Prospero wanted to confront the men who betrayed him without seeking revenge. Initially I did not see Propero in the same way but as you point out, Prospero is able to make the men feel shame and regret. I agree with you that Prospero did not "seek revenge" because he was able to gain sympathy without ever causing any real harm to the men.
ReplyDelete