The relationship between Gloucester and his two sons, Edgar and Edmund, can be viewed as a sub-plot that can be compared and contrasted to that Lear and his daughters. Just as Lear turns away his true faithful daughter, Cordelia, Gloucester turns away from his honest son Edgar to the manipulative and greedy son, Edmund. Both fathers make the same error in judgement by listening to the lies of their manipulative children, while turning away their faithful children in an unjustly manor.
Gloucester also suffers from his error, but in a much more physically painful sense. Edmund's betrayal of his father results in Gloucester's eyes being gouged out, while Regan and Goneril's mistreatment of Lear results in his slip into senility. The suffering in both these senses is ironic in effect: Gloucester was blind of both Edgar and Edmund's true intent just as Lear was mad to believe Regan and Goneril's greed for love. It is only when both of the fathers have physically succumbed to their individual faults that they see the error in their ways.
Shakespeare makes an interesting parallel with the sub-plot of this play, but it fails to help the overall plot and understanding. Both father's made a mistake, mistrusting the wrong of their youth, and both suffer and ultimately see their mistake through their pain. The only difference is the method by which each was punished in the end, which ultimately does nothing for the story; it just creates two of the same tragic protagonists. Perhaps if one father would have caught the slip or possibly further punished himself, there would be more contrast between each one's plot to help advance the plot of the overall play.
Friday, August 31, 2012
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Lear's Fool
As in many of his dramas, Shakespeare uses the fool as an ironic source of wisdom and logic. As a witty jester and an object of humiliation for others' enjoyment, the fool is surprisingly the character who makes the most logical sense in the play. The fool takes on the role of an informal royal advisor; he reveals Lear's errors in judgement throughout the play. An example early on in the play, the fool addresses Kent (in disguise) who wishes to accompany and aid Lear: "[. . .] Why, this / fellow has banish'd two on's daughters, and did the / third a blessing against his will: if thou follow him thou / must needs to wear my coxcomb" (Act 1 Scene 4 96-99). He calls Kent a fool himself for wanting to follow Lear, but this is not a warning message to Kent but a reality check for Lear. Ultimately, while the Fool's critical comments on Lear can be somewhat cruel his objective is to help him.
The fool seems to be most effective in Act 3, Scene 6 when he holds a mock trial of Lear's daughters. At this point Lear has begun to slip into senility; however, he finally internally realizes the shallowness of his daughters, Goneril and Regan in this slip from reality. The fool disappears from the play after Lear, now thoroughly mad, reaches Dover. He could have disappeared because of Lear's mental state, or possibly because at this point Lear has realized his mistakes and the fool has completed his task.
The fool seems to be most effective in Act 3, Scene 6 when he holds a mock trial of Lear's daughters. At this point Lear has begun to slip into senility; however, he finally internally realizes the shallowness of his daughters, Goneril and Regan in this slip from reality. The fool disappears from the play after Lear, now thoroughly mad, reaches Dover. He could have disappeared because of Lear's mental state, or possibly because at this point Lear has realized his mistakes and the fool has completed his task.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)